# Warning FDAC341 for SS domain

**URL:** <https://forum.certara.com/t/warning-fdac341-for-ss-domain/1172>\
**Category:** SDTM\
**Created:** [November 1, 2017, 1:47pm UTC](https://forum.certara.com/t/warning-fdac341-for-ss-domain/1172 "2017-11-01T13:47:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sergiy](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/certara/user_avatar/forum.certara.com/sergiy/32/2553_2.png) [@Sergiy](https://forum.certara.com/u/Sergiy)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 10:47pm UTC](https://forum.certara.com/t/warning-fdac341-for-ss-domain/1172/1 "2017-11-02T22:47:02Z")

</div>

Hi Abdul,

This is due to an inconsistency between CDISC SDTM and CDISC CT standards. So far SS domain is not included into standard CDISC Control Terminology _‘SDTM Domain Abbreviation’ extensible codelist_. EC domain is another example.

Kind Regards,

Sergiy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AbdulLokhandvala](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/838e76/32.png) [@AbdulLokhandvala](https://forum.certara.com/u/AbdulLokhandvala)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2017, 1:47pm UTC](https://forum.certara.com/t/warning-fdac341-for-ss-domain/1172/2 "2017-11-01T13:47:54Z")

</div>

Hi,

There is a warning for DOMAIN variable value in SS data stating: _DOMAIN value not found in ‘SDTM Domain Abbreviation’ extensible codelist._

SS domain has already been included in the 3.2 IG in findings category, but still warning appears. Is this a bug? Could you please provide further input?

Thanks,

Abdul.