An SDTM variable exists as a value of QNAM in a suppqual dataset

Pinnacle 21 Product Suggestions Validation Rule Suggestions
1

Hi Carol,

I think this is definitely a good check to be implemented. Another one could be QLABEL related.

Thank you,

Sergiy Sirichenko

2

Having an SDTM variable as a value of QNAM does not appear to trigger any violation. We had a SUPPVS with a QNAM value of VSREASND (of course VSREASND should have been a variable in VS and not placed in SUPPVS) but OpenCDISC didn’t detect this problem. Also, we had a SUPPEG with a QMAM value of EGEVAL, and the variable EGEVAL was already a variable in EG, but OpenCDISC did not detect this problem either. When we used WebSDM we knew such problems existed because WebSDM would have a load failure if such situations existed. It would save sponsors manual checking on the SUPP QNAM values if OpenCDISC could check for these problems.