DD0024 rule mis-firing?

Pinnacle 21 Support Define.xml
1

Hi Barry,

This false-positive message is due to inconsistency in CDISC CT non-extensible (STENRF) codelist. Recently an original term “U” was replaced by a new “UNKNOWN” term.

A new version of OpenCDISC validator will handle this issue.

Kind Regards,

Sergiy

2

The OpenCDISC Validator is reporting an error DD0024 for the variable CM.CMST/ENRF. I’m running a “define only” check job. These variables use a code list called STENRF. However when I look at the contents of the define.xml for the STENRF code list it appears correct to me (see below). Is the DD0024 rule mis-firing?

AFTER

BEFORE

DURING

DURING/AFTER

UNKNOWN