Dear all when we use subject(sequence) as fixed effect according to EMEA regulatory the anova results (ntrasubject or sequential SS) are incomplete? why ? when we use SAS pro glm method fixed effect + random effect vs fixed effect all the anova tables are showing same results. then how can we differentiate fixed +random effect vs fixed effect for two different regulatory. thanks and regards Karthik
In the next release of Phoenix, these will also be given for models with all fixed effects. In the current version, they are given just for the Phoenix default model for 2x2 crossover.