Running CLI of ADSL alone

Pinnacle 21 Support Troubleshooting and Problems
1

Hi Jeroen,

Thank you for the feedback!

We’ve reproduced this bug and will work on a solution. It happens only if you provide the source parameter as a path to a folder with a single file inside.

As a workaround, you can add a filename to the source.adam parameter, for example --source.adam=“&path\XPT_ADAM\adsl.xpt”. Then ADSL will be picked for validation correctly and AD0001 won’t fire.

Thanks,

Philipp

2

Apparently this issue is ongoing in updated P21C version 3.1.0.

Will this still get resolved in a next software version?

Kind regards, Jeroen

3

Jeroen,

Yes, this issue will be resolved in the next Community release.

Until then, the workaround is to add a filename to the source.adam parameter, for example --source.adam=“&path\XPT_ADAM\adsl.xpt”

Please let me know if there is anything more I can do to help,
Rob

4

When validating ADSL via CLI and specifying source domains as library paths, the report is not correct and mentions reject code AD0001 ‘Missing ADSL dataset’.

In below code, folder XPT_ADAM contains adsl.xpt and XPT_SDTM contains dm.xpt, ex.xpt, ae.xpt.

x "java -jar “&path\p21-client-1.0.2.jar”

–engine.version=“FDA 1903.1”
–standard=adam
–standard.version=1.1
–source.sdtm=“&path\XPT_SDTM”
–source.adam=“&path\XPT_ADAM”
–cdisc.ct.sdtm.version=2020-05-08
–cdisc.ct.adam.version=2020-03-27
–report=“&path\REPORT\Pinnacle21_report_adsl.xlsx” ";

Can this issue get resolved?

Kind regards,
Jeroen Den Herder (SGS Life Sciences)