SE Variables in wrong order - not in line with SDTM IG 3.2

Pinnacle 21 Support SDTM
1

Hi Heidi,

Is your problem related to the following forum entry: SD1079: wrong order for added variables in SE | Pinnacle 21 ?

Jozef

2

Hi,

after getting Warnings in Pinnacle 21 Community validator for SE variables in wrong order I had a look into config/SDTM 3.2.xml and found that for some of the SE variables the order defined there is not consistent with corresponding SDTM IG:

According to the SDTM IG 3.2 the order is: …-ETCD-ELEMENT-SESTDTC-SEENDTC-TAETORD-EPOCH-SEUPDES-SESTDY-SEENDY

According to config/SDTM3.2.xml the order is: …-ETCD-ELEMENT-SEUPDES-TAETORD-EPOCH-SESTDTC-SEENDTC-SESTDY-SEENDY

Thus, the warnings we get seem not to be in line with SDTM IG 3.2

Do you agree?

Thanks, Heidi